SLAVERY in HISTORY
![]() |
Charleston, SC and slavery books |
Why am I not surprised to see the above headline? Maybe it’s because of my experience as the author of four historical fiction novels that tell the story of whites and slaves on a Southern plantation in 1857.
Before self-publishing, I queried a number of literary agents seeking a representative for my work. Two of them told me (a white woman) that they could not sell the manuscript in New York because there were slaves in the story. Maybe my books aren’t good books, but to have them rejected because of the subject matter doesn’t give me a chance, even if they’re excellent books. How has compassionate socialism turned into political correctness and worse, repression?
Our media spurns Putin’s decision to rewrite Russian history, as if we aren’t doing the same thing. According to The Conversation, “New Russian high school textbooks … attempt to whitewash Stalinist crimes and rehabilitate the Soviet Union’s legacy.”
In particular, Russian history is being revised to “gloss over Stalin’s Terror and other truths.”
From
the History News Network:
Now you see him, now you don’t. Stalin was a past master at the art of
airbrushing. In one classic set of photographs, there Stalin is with his secret
police chief, Nikolai Yezhov — and in the next photo, there Yezhov isn’t (he
was executed in 1940, with his boss’s approval). And now, in Vladimir Putin’s
Russia, the airbrushing of history seems to be all the rage again.
Are we Americans trying to airbrush our history of slavery? A fiction novel set in the antebellum South either conforms to certain social strictures or it doesn’t get published by legacy publishers, regardless of the merit of the writing. When our history is ugly, no good is served by suppressing it.