Monday, January 18, 2016
What is good?
RIGHT AND WRONG, GOOD AND BAD
January of
last year I resolved to attend Mass once a month, something I didn’t do. So
this year I didn’t make that resolution, but it doesn’t mean I don’t want to
find a church.
It seems
to me that with respect to our view on life, we fall into one of two
categories. Either we believe we are here by accident or we believe we’re part
of a designed creation. That is to say we’re either atheists or believers in
some religion.
AGNOSTICS
In the
past, I’ve said I was an agnostic, but that’s not a third alternative. Agnostics
can’t make up their mind about which of the two alternatives to go with. Perhaps
I could edge (despondently) into the atheists’ camp if science could nail down a
theory to explain the origin of the universe (even if another universe preceded
the Big Bang, where did it come from?). Whatever the science, I would have
trouble believing that life, whether that of an individual, nation, world, or
universe, exists as coincidence.
Since I
believe life evolved deliberately, it behooves me to try to live according to a
purpose beyond my understanding. Where will I get worthwhile values and
judgments? Where can I look for help to decide what is right and what is wrong?
I might say, “They got it wrong,” about ISIS adherents who commit suicide in
service to their belief. But if a suicide advances a “right” belief, is it
“wrong”? Was it “wrong” for an Allied soldier to kill a Nazi?
THE LITMUS TEST
I’ve tried
to set a standard for right, or good, as whatever improves the plight of myself
and/or my fellow person. Or conversely, wrong, or bad, is whatever is damaging.
But that standard is undermined by the vagaries of improve and damage, and this
is not just semantics.
I might
think it is “right” to support building a new hospital or homeless shelter, but
what if it forces other people out of their homes? Is it “wrong” to go on a
shopping spree instead of volunteering at the local school? Or to throw away good
food when children in other places are starving? Or drive a car and destroy the
ozone? What about owning oil stocks? How can I recognize when I am being
materialistic or self-obsessed when those attributes are characteristic of my
culture?
IDIOT'S GUIDE TO WHAT'S RIGHT?
This is
going a long way to say that I want ethical guidance, despite my abiding
distrust of being guided by a religion. Any religion that is confident it knows the mind of God is frightening. And holy
writ, such as the Bible, Torah, or Koran, is not the final authority on God.
Even inspired interpretation of these texts can lead to antiquated dogma.
My husband
says there are two sides to every argument. Which can be understood to mean
that in every dispute, both sides are right and wrong. What is right and what
is wrong hangs in an inscrutable balance. Given the limitations of my knowledge of the world, I can’t depend on myself alone to
make “right” decisions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment